Yesterday I read a very interesting essay on a topic some don't want anything to do with. Torture. Some people will say "absolutely not," or "under no circumstances," but for Michael Levins, that is not the case. He realizes some of the situations that we as a country could be put in, and under some circumstances, understands methods to help get America out of them; torture.
Levins made some very compelling points such as if a terrorist said he had a bomb hidden that could kill thousands of people, would it not be logical to get the answer from him by any means possible? Torture is a good way to do this. Some people would disagree saying torture is "off limits," or "unethical," but is the price of possibly thousands of people not worth the torture of one person who, knowing the daring consequences, still planted a bomb somewhere? In situations such as that, I agree with Michael Levins in that torture is necessary. Some people may still disagree with torture in those situations because they are "unethical," but you must ask the questions, "Where would America be today if it had only done what is 'ethical'? What would have become of World War II?"
Levins made an interesting comment in his essay in that Roosevelt had the opportunity to assassinate Hitler during his reign but refused by moral grounds. To me, that is kind of upsetting to know that Hitler was allowing to go on with his doings while America just sat there. While this blog and Levins's essay are primarily opinions, I hope they have made you think about how America deals with these situations.